12/21/2023 0 Comments Language proof and logic world 7.17![]() The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus basically says the integral is inverse to the derivative and the derivative is inverse to the integral. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math where they had a ill-defined infinity they had the fakery of Limit concept and they had the fakery of a continuum. World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle EditionĬalculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.Ĭover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.ĪP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle EditionĮver since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition I mean, Max is a serious clown over Kibo. Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer viewsĪP writes: Yoo Nick, so you give front cover to a 27 year long stalking shithead like James Kibo Parry? Nicholas, why not give front page coverage to Max Tegmark with his proton 938 MeV, electron 0.5 MeV which hydrogen atom would fall apart. ![]() Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan More and more layers of error thinking physics ![]() Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs. ![]() LIST of Failed Physicists because they still believe electron is 0.5MeV, in no order, and so very stupid are they in physics, for they could not even understand the physics of angular momentum of two particles 938 to 0.5 rather than 840 to 105 MeV so that a hydrogen atom can exist in a 840 to 105 ratio, never a 938 to 0.5 ratio Nicholas Thompson, editor in chief, Wired magazine In the early 1990s, as public awareness grew of the Internet and Usenet, Parry received publicity, including a cover story in Wired magazine. >rearranged, spell "Urine Spout Calmed Him".ĥ-Nicholas Thompson, Wired magazine// Kibo Parry Moroney, stalker sickfuck gets published in Wired for his 938 is 12% short of 945, Yoo, Nick, why not publish Max Tegmark with his 938MeV proton, 0.5MeV electron which a hydrogen atom ceases to exist Piñata of sci.math and Punching Bag of sci.physics Kibo Parry Moroney says Max Tegmark, MIT, with his 10 OR 7 = 17, his ellipse a conic when it never was, and his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth it is 840 to 105 MeV, says Max is a "Urine Spout", Kibo, is "fruitcake" out of style?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |